coverage and say "there's a map for that". Well, AT&T is now suing Verizon for those adds because they are deceptively making people think that AT&T doesn't get coverage in areas where there is no 3G, which is most untrue. They are asking for a restraining order against Verizon and the add.
Wednesday, November 4, 2009
AT&T vs. Verizon
You know those Verizon Wireless commercials you see all the time that accuse AT&T of not having coverage? The add depict people walking around with maps above their heads that show no 
coverage and say "there's a map for that". Well, AT&T is now suing Verizon for those adds because they are deceptively making people think that AT&T doesn't get coverage in areas where there is no 3G, which is most untrue. They are asking for a restraining order against Verizon and the add.
coverage and say "there's a map for that". Well, AT&T is now suing Verizon for those adds because they are deceptively making people think that AT&T doesn't get coverage in areas where there is no 3G, which is most untrue. They are asking for a restraining order against Verizon and the add.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment